I don't think it's really worth the expense of the 17mm tilt-shift lens for landscapes.īasically shifting allows you to capture more of your image without recomposing. Also the front element of the 17mm is domed and fully exposed to the elements, no hood and its not inset (which is kind of scary). A note on the 17mm, I found it to be too wide, wider than 21mm is generally too wide for my taste. I find the 24L TSE II to be my go-to lens for photographing nature, I bring that and a 70-200L usually for 'nature/outdoors' photo treks. Like Jrista and I were talking about its very useful to be able to tilt the plane of focus so that everything from your feet to the mountains are in focus even at f3.5 in case the light is lowīesides landscapes the 90mm has a very favorable magnification factor for pseudo-macro work with flowers and plants that have flower-heads or leaves on an off-plane of focus.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |